Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4745 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Core i7-620M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-620M - 197 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-620M | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |