The Core i7-620LM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 25 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-11600K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-11600K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
82%
Min 1% FPS
112
84%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, €
€328.23
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-11600K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
57%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$300.00 | MSRP | $262.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Arrandale | Codename | Rocket Lake |
25 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |