The Core i7-620LM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 25 vs 65 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-9100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
89%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€128.99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-9100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$300.00 | MSRP | $122.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
25 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |