The Core i7-620LM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-7100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 25 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-7100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-7100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
91%
Min 1% FPS
112
92%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-7100
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, €
€125.61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-7100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-7100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Core i3-7100
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $300.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
25 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
