The Core i7-620LM is a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-540. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620LM
- Consumes up to 66% less energy – 25 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-540
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-540 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Please refine your search results or...
Shoot us an email and we'll quickly add this!
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
166
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
€298
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
100%
Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-540 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620LM vs Core i3-540 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620LM
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
80%
Core i3-540
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620LM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-540 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $300.00 | MSRP | $133.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Clarkdale |
25 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
