In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-5820K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $0 cheaper!
Core i7-5820K
- Up to 0% cheaper – $429.95 vs $429.99
- Up to 0% cheaper
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 48% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.16 vs $6.05/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-5820K vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-5820K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
71 FPS
52%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
52%
Price, $
$429.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.05/FPS
52%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
99%
Value, $/FPS
$3.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-5820K vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-5820K vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-5820K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
15 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-5820K Sep 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2014 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
