Core i7-4940MX vs Core i9-13900F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i7-4940MX is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4940MX
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 57 vs 65 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-13900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Average FPS
199
84%
Min 1% FPS
136
84%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
237
100%
Min 1% FPS
161
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4940MX vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4940MX
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4940MX | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $1,096.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
57 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
