In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4820K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4820K
No clear advantages
Core i9-12900KF
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 92% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-12900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
62 FPS
52%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
52%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 [12th Gen] i9-12900KF Hexadeca-core [16 Core] 3.20 GHz Processor - OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B09LMQ7XGX.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
10 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
