In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4810MQ is slower than the Core i9-10920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4810MQ
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 47 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10920X
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6 – 87 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Jan 20, 2014
- Is 5 years and 8 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i9-10920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
87 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
100%
Price, $
$869.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i9-10920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4810MQ vs Core i9-10920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4810MQ
Jan 20th, 2014
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
31%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
79%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4810MQ Jan 20th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10920X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 20th, 2014 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA2066 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR4 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
