The Core i7-4765T is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4765T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G645
The Core i7-4765T is better in every way
Core i7-4765T vs Pentium G645 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
176
100%
Min 1% FPS
118
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Pentium G645
Sep 2nd, 2012
Average FPS
167
95%
Min 1% FPS
112
95%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-4765T vs Pentium G645 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4765T vs Pentium G645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4765T vs Pentium G645 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Pentium G645
Sep 2nd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4765T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G645 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
$303.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |