In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4610M is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 8700G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4610M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 37 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Ryzen 7 8700G
- Up to 80% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 66 FPS
- Up to 80% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Feb 01, 2014
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen 7 8700G: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
119 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$278.18
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen 7 8700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4610M vs Ryzen 7 8700G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4610M
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4610M Feb 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700G Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | AM5 |
37W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Radeon 780M |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
