Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3978 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €50.93 vs €690.00
- Up to 92% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.20 vs €2.39 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3820 - 289 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
257
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €50.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |