Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3188 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - €52.56 vs €245.00
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5900X - €0.45 vs €1.68 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3820 - 146 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
117
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
Buy for €245 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7382 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |