Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4264 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €52.56 vs €471.07
- Up to 87% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-14900K - €0.32 vs €2.49 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Core i7-3820 - 189 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
164
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €52.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7383 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
13%
Price, €
€471.07
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |