Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €255.20 vs €471.07
- Up to 32% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900K - €1.63 vs €2.39 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 25% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-3770K - 197 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 32 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
80%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €255.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7782 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.39/FPS
68%
Price, €
€471.07
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7782 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |