Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2445 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €152.66 vs €515.53
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KF - €0.89 vs €2.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770 - 193 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
172
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
33%
Price, €
€515.53
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €515.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770 | vs | Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |