Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2364 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 77 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770 - 246 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €16.73 vs €152.66
- Up to 89% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770 - €0.07 vs €0.66 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 284 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €16.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 290 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770 | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |