Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €152.66 vs €612.36
- Up to 71% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900F - €1.30 vs €4.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 17% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-3770 - 137 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 32 vs 8 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.47/FPS
29%
Price, €
€612.36
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €612.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |