Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3476 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Core i7-3770
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €156.31 vs €434.79
- Up to 60% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-12900K - €1.07 vs €2.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3770 - 163 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
146
90%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €156.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
40%
Price, €
€434.79
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €434.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |