The Core i7-3520M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-14900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i7-3520M vs Core i9-14900K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
185
76%
Min 1% FPS
128
77%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3520M vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3520M vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
11%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3520M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 6.0 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
