Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4040 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 55 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-2920XM - 327 vs 295 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
327
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2920XM | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |