In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2860QM is much slower than the Core i9-14900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 12 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2860QM vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2860QM vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2860QM vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2860QM
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2860QM Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
