Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3594 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i7-2820QM - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2820QM | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |