Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3191 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 19% better in Valorant than Core i7-2675QM - 813 vs 683 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-2675QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2675QM | vs | Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
