Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3958 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-2635QM - 214 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€419.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €419.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2635QM | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |