In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2630QM is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 1700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6 – 70 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Mar 02, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2630QM vs Ryzen 7 1700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2630QM vs Ryzen 7 1700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2630QM vs Ryzen 7 1700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2630QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 1700
Mar 2nd, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2630QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 1700 Mar 2nd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
