Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Core i7-2600K
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - €154.28 vs €157.00
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Core i7-2600K - 287 vs 258 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-2600K - €0.55 vs €0.60 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €154.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€157
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €157 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2600K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |