Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-14700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-14700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i7-14700F.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €372.04 vs €534.60
- Up to 26% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900K - €0.67 vs €0.91 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700F - 587 vs 558 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€372.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €372.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
74%
Price, €
€534.6
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €534.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 24 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |