Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-12900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700F is 734 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-12900.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield V than Core i9-12900 - 287 vs 276 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - €378.37 vs €498.88
- Up to 27% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900 - €1.32 vs €1.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900 - 28 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€378.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €378.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
Buy for €498.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700F | vs | Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |