Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-12400F - 272 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €133.09 vs €400.00
- Up to 62% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-13700KF - €0.56 vs €1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6704 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
238
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6705 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700KF | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |