Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-13700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-13700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-13700F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €400.48 vs €679.99
- Up to 39% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-14900F - €1.44 vs €2.37 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-13700F - 287 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700F - 32 vs 24 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
278
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€400.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €400.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.37/FPS
61%
Price, €
€679.99
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €679.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700F | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |