Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14400F - 215 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-14400F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €184.94 vs €307.20
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700F - €0.89 vs €1.43 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €307.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
208
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€184.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €184.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-13700F | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |