The Core i7-13700E is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-10320. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-13700E
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-10320
The Core i7-13700E is better in every way
Core i7-13700E vs Core i3-10320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-13700E
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
137
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
189
91%
Min 1% FPS
125
91%
Price, €
€161.75
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700E vs Core i3-10320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-13700E vs Core i3-10320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-13700E vs Core i3-10320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-13700E
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i3-10320
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-13700E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
1.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 GHz |
30 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |