The Core i7-10750H is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Athlon 200GE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-10750H
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Athlon 200GE
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
Core i7-10750H vs Athlon 200GE for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10750H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Average FPS
176
94%
Min 1% FPS
118
95%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10750H vs Athlon 200GE in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10750H vs Athlon 200GE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10750H vs Athlon 200GE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10750H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Athlon 200GE
Sep 6th, 2018
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-10750H | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $55.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
