Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 298 days older than the more expensive Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Core i7-10700KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-10700KF - 224 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €85.00 vs €382.94
- Up to 78% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-10700KF - €0.38 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €382.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 965 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 965 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700KF | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |