In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-10700K is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $66 more expensive!
Core i7-10700K
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 125 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6 – 130 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 17% cheaper – $314.99 vs $380.99
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 45% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.42 vs $4.37/FPS
- Up to 45% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
87 FPS
67%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
66%
Price, $
$380.99
82%
Value, $/FPS
$4.37/FPS
55%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
130 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700K vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
56%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM5 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
