Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - €376.42 vs €612.36
- Up to 26% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900F - €2.09 vs €2.84 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-10700F - 216 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
83%
Value, €/FPS
€2.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€376.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €376.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 411 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
74%
Price, €
€612.36
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for €612.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 410 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |