The Core i7-10700F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-530, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's €263.22 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-530
- Up to 82% cheaper – €56.40 vs €319.62
- A better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-10700F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-530 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, €
€319.62
17%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
20%
Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-530 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-10700F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-530 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Not Available | MSRP | $113.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
65 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |