Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 635 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700.
Advantages of Core i7-10700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 4% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-10700 - 562 vs 539 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - €81.33 vs €280.56
- Up to 73% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-10700 - €0.14 vs €0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 58 vs 65 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €280.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
562
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |