Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1092 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - €208.62 vs €444.28
- Up to 52% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-12900F - €1.13 vs €2.35 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Core i5-9400F - 189 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
184
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1389 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
48%
Price, €
€444.28
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €444.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1662 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |