Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 1826 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-14700 - €208.62 vs €376.32
- Up to 38% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-14700 - €1.72 vs €2.77 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - 136 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 28 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €208.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 668 minutes ago
Buy for €376.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 942 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Core i7-14700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
6 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |