Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Core i5-9400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - €142.66 vs €336.06
- Up to 56% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-13700 - €0.61 vs €1.40 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-9400F - 240 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
234
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €142.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
Buy for €336.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400F | vs | Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |