Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7500.
Advantages of Core i5-7500
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500 - 146 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-7500 - €314.00 vs €328.34
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500 - €2.15 vs €2.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €328.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7500 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |