Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-14100F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i5-7400T is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i3-14100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
194
85%
Min 1% FPS
133
86%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
227
100%
Min 1% FPS
155
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-7400T vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
64%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-7400T | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
