Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2644 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6500.
Advantages of Core i5-6500
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €45.85 vs €419.80
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-13700K - €0.11 vs €0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-6500 - 486 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
404
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
486
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
13%
Price, €
€419.8
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €419.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 598 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6500 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |