Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3029 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Core i5-6400
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €293.45 vs €471.07
- Up to 25% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900K - €2.49 vs €3.34 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6400 - 141 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
118
84%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€293.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €293.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.34/FPS
75%
Price, €
€471.07
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for €471.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6400 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |