The Core i5-6400 is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4670 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's €82.05 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4670
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 28% cheaper – €211.40 vs €293.45
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i5-6400 vs Core i5-4670 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
180
99%
Min 1% FPS
120
99%
Price, €
€293.45
72%
Value, €/FPS
€1.63/FPS
71%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€211.4
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Core i5-6400 vs Core i5-4670 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-6400 vs Core i5-4670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-6400 vs Core i5-4670 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-6400
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
65 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
