Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3112 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Core i5-6400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-6400 - 468 vs 401 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €108.83 vs €293.45
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-6400 - €0.23 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €293.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 886 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
468
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €108.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1159 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6400 | vs | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |