The Core i5-4690K is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-14500. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-4690K
The Core i5-14500 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-14500
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Core i5-4690K vs Core i5-14500 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
184
88%
Min 1% FPS
122
88%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-14500
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
210
100%
Min 1% FPS
138
100%
Price, €
€254.7
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Core i5-4690K vs Core i5-14500 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-4690K vs Core i5-14500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-4690K vs Core i5-14500 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-4690K
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
6 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
33%
Core i5-14500
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-4690K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-14500 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $243.00 | MSRP | $232.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| 88 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.0 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 24 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
