Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3159 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Core i5-4670K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Core i5-4670K - 761 vs 709 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - €81.33 vs €109.76
- Up to 27% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-4670K - €0.11 vs €0.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 58 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €109.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
761
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670K | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |